Against comfort: Political implications of evading discomfort

Ditte Marie Munch-Jurisic*

*Corresponding author

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelpeer review

Abstract

We typically think of emotional states as highly individualised and subjective. But visceral gut feelings like discomfort can be better understood as collective and public, when they reflect implicit biases that an individual has internalised. Most of us evade discomfort in favour of comfort, often unconsciously. This inclination, innocent in most cases, also has social and political consequences. Research has established that it is easier to interact with people who resemble us and that such in-group favouritism contributes to subtle forms of discrimination. If we want a more equal and unbiased society, we have a duty to expose ourselves to more discomfort. Living up to this duty requires an enhanced emotional vocabulary that captures the political dimensions of physiological affect. I argue that a better understanding of what I call interaction discomfort can mitigate subtle forms of discrimination.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftGlobal Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Current Affairs and Applied Contemporary Thought
Vol/bind10
Udgave nummer2-3
Sider (fra-til)277-297
Antal sider21
ISSN2326-9995
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2020

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the Carlsberg Foundation under grant no. CF16-0580.

Citer dette