Access to land reconsidered

The land grab, polycentric governance and Tanzania’s new wave land reform

Rasmus Hundsbæk Pedersen

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

Inspired by Ostrom’s concept of polycentric governance, this article aims to refine the analytical framework through which contemporary access to land is analysed. By drawing on extensive fieldwork and conducting a review of the existing literature on the making and implementation of Tanzania’s 1999 land reform, it challenges some of the main assumptions behind the land access and land grabbing literatures about the level at which agency is placed. Processes governing access to land are more contingent than they are most often depicted, involving actors at the local, national and international levels. National and local level actors are often more important than, in particular, the land grab literature tends to suggest. This implies that the state should be seen not merely as a site of ‘legitimate theft’, but also as one in which rights may be upheld. Based on the experience of Tanzania, the article suggests that analytical a priori assumptions about where agency is placed should be abandoned and replaced with empirical research into the relations between actors at all levels.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftGeoforum
Vol/bind72
Sider (fra-til)104-113
ISSN0016-7185
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2016
Udgivet eksterntJa

Citer dette

@article{0d55f5dbc2944407a9b04f56f41f77b5,
title = "Access to land reconsidered: The land grab, polycentric governance and Tanzania’s new wave land reform",
abstract = "Inspired by Ostrom’s concept of polycentric governance, this article aims to refine the analytical framework through which contemporary access to land is analysed. By drawing on extensive fieldwork and conducting a review of the existing literature on the making and implementation of Tanzania’s 1999 land reform, it challenges some of the main assumptions behind the land access and land grabbing literatures about the level at which agency is placed. Processes governing access to land are more contingent than they are most often depicted, involving actors at the local, national and international levels. National and local level actors are often more important than, in particular, the land grab literature tends to suggest. This implies that the state should be seen not merely as a site of ‘legitimate theft’, but also as one in which rights may be upheld. Based on the experience of Tanzania, the article suggests that analytical a priori assumptions about where agency is placed should be abandoned and replaced with empirical research into the relations between actors at all levels.",
author = "Pedersen, {Rasmus Hundsb{\ae}k}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.12.010",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "104--113",
journal = "Geoforum",
issn = "0016-7185",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

Access to land reconsidered : The land grab, polycentric governance and Tanzania’s new wave land reform. / Pedersen, Rasmus Hundsbæk.

I: Geoforum, Bind 72, 2016, s. 104-113.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Access to land reconsidered

T2 - The land grab, polycentric governance and Tanzania’s new wave land reform

AU - Pedersen, Rasmus Hundsbæk

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Inspired by Ostrom’s concept of polycentric governance, this article aims to refine the analytical framework through which contemporary access to land is analysed. By drawing on extensive fieldwork and conducting a review of the existing literature on the making and implementation of Tanzania’s 1999 land reform, it challenges some of the main assumptions behind the land access and land grabbing literatures about the level at which agency is placed. Processes governing access to land are more contingent than they are most often depicted, involving actors at the local, national and international levels. National and local level actors are often more important than, in particular, the land grab literature tends to suggest. This implies that the state should be seen not merely as a site of ‘legitimate theft’, but also as one in which rights may be upheld. Based on the experience of Tanzania, the article suggests that analytical a priori assumptions about where agency is placed should be abandoned and replaced with empirical research into the relations between actors at all levels.

AB - Inspired by Ostrom’s concept of polycentric governance, this article aims to refine the analytical framework through which contemporary access to land is analysed. By drawing on extensive fieldwork and conducting a review of the existing literature on the making and implementation of Tanzania’s 1999 land reform, it challenges some of the main assumptions behind the land access and land grabbing literatures about the level at which agency is placed. Processes governing access to land are more contingent than they are most often depicted, involving actors at the local, national and international levels. National and local level actors are often more important than, in particular, the land grab literature tends to suggest. This implies that the state should be seen not merely as a site of ‘legitimate theft’, but also as one in which rights may be upheld. Based on the experience of Tanzania, the article suggests that analytical a priori assumptions about where agency is placed should be abandoned and replaced with empirical research into the relations between actors at all levels.

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.12.010

DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.12.010

M3 - Journal article

VL - 72

SP - 104

EP - 113

JO - Geoforum

JF - Geoforum

SN - 0016-7185

ER -