Abstract
Ethiopia, the host of the African Union, did not ratify the African
Women’s Rights framework (the Maputo Protocol) for fifteen years. While
realist, liberal and constructivist scholars have theorised why
countries ratify human rights treaties, this article adds to this debate
by asking ‘why not?’. Based on interviews, archival material, document
analysis and fieldwork in Addis Ababa, the article explores the dominant
explanations for adopting human rights treaties, such as donor
pressure, legitimacy, openness of a political system and normative
alignment. By analysing the Ethiopian government’s decision not to
ratify the Maputo Protocol on numerous occasions before finally
ratifying it quietly and with a long list of reservations, the article
argues that countries may adopt regional human rights treaties for
different reasons than the global ones. By tracing this ‘non-event’ from
the early attempts to adopt the Maputo Protocol until its ratification
in 2018, the article provides an in-depth analysis of the recent history
of women’s rights in Ethiopia’s complex national context, including the
rise of women’s movements, closing civil space, growing
authoritarianism, anti-rights rhetoric, and a government crisis that
paved way for reform.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | Journal of Eastern African Studies |
| Vol/bind | 17 |
| Udgave nummer | 3 |
| Sider (fra-til) | 466-488 |
| Antal sider | 23 |
| ISSN | 1753-1055 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - 2023 |
Emneord
- African politics
- African Union
- Ethiopia
- human rights ratification
- regional governance
- women’s rights