A New Institutionalism? The English School as International Sociological Theory

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Resumé

In this article I engage with the theoretical opening provided by Barry Buzan’s From International to World Society? I present an argument for five functional categories, which should be able to encompass all the institutions identified by English School scholars throughout history. Their introduction should point the way towards a sounder analytical framework for the study of what Buzan believes should be the new subject of the discipline of International Relations (IR). This subject is defined as second-order societies, meaning societies ‘where the members are not individual human beings, but durable collectivities of humans possessed of identities and actor qualities that are more than the sum of their parts’, and where the content of these societies, and the key object of analysis, is primary institutions. The purpose of the five functional categories is to break down this ‘social whole’ and provide a set of lenses through which to potentially analyse international societies throughout history.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftInternational Relations
Vol/bind25
Udgave nummer1
Sider (fra-til)26-44
ISSN0047-1178
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 apr. 2011

Citer dette

@article{258654c0e19e4c7c934a4b83f0400af7,
title = "A New Institutionalism? The English School as International Sociological Theory",
abstract = "In this article I engage with the theoretical opening provided by Barry Buzan’s From International to World Society? I present an argument for five functional categories, which should be able to encompass all the institutions identified by English School scholars throughout history. Their introduction should point the way towards a sounder analytical framework for the study of what Buzan believes should be the new subject of the discipline of International Relations (IR). This subject is defined as second-order societies, meaning societies ‘where the members are not individual human beings, but durable collectivities of humans possessed of identities and actor qualities that are more than the sum of their parts’, and where the content of these societies, and the key object of analysis, is primary institutions. The purpose of the five functional categories is to break down this ‘social whole’ and provide a set of lenses through which to potentially analyse international societies throughout history.",
keywords = "constructivism, English School, functional differentiation, international society, primary institutions, Sociology",
author = "Laust Schouenborg",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0047117810396992",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "26--44",
journal = "International Relations",
issn = "0047-1178",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

A New Institutionalism? The English School as International Sociological Theory. / Schouenborg, Laust.

I: International Relations, Bind 25, Nr. 1, 01.04.2011, s. 26-44.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A New Institutionalism? The English School as International Sociological Theory

AU - Schouenborg, Laust

PY - 2011/4/1

Y1 - 2011/4/1

N2 - In this article I engage with the theoretical opening provided by Barry Buzan’s From International to World Society? I present an argument for five functional categories, which should be able to encompass all the institutions identified by English School scholars throughout history. Their introduction should point the way towards a sounder analytical framework for the study of what Buzan believes should be the new subject of the discipline of International Relations (IR). This subject is defined as second-order societies, meaning societies ‘where the members are not individual human beings, but durable collectivities of humans possessed of identities and actor qualities that are more than the sum of their parts’, and where the content of these societies, and the key object of analysis, is primary institutions. The purpose of the five functional categories is to break down this ‘social whole’ and provide a set of lenses through which to potentially analyse international societies throughout history.

AB - In this article I engage with the theoretical opening provided by Barry Buzan’s From International to World Society? I present an argument for five functional categories, which should be able to encompass all the institutions identified by English School scholars throughout history. Their introduction should point the way towards a sounder analytical framework for the study of what Buzan believes should be the new subject of the discipline of International Relations (IR). This subject is defined as second-order societies, meaning societies ‘where the members are not individual human beings, but durable collectivities of humans possessed of identities and actor qualities that are more than the sum of their parts’, and where the content of these societies, and the key object of analysis, is primary institutions. The purpose of the five functional categories is to break down this ‘social whole’ and provide a set of lenses through which to potentially analyse international societies throughout history.

KW - constructivism

KW - English School

KW - functional differentiation

KW - international society

KW - primary institutions

KW - Sociology

U2 - 10.1177/0047117810396992

DO - 10.1177/0047117810396992

M3 - Journal article

VL - 25

SP - 26

EP - 44

JO - International Relations

JF - International Relations

SN - 0047-1178

IS - 1

ER -